What Happened

  • Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) was a highly leveraged hedge fund founded by top financial minds, including Nobel laureates and former Salomon Brothers traders.

  • Through the mid-1990s, it delivered exceptional returns by using quantitative models to exploit small pricing discrepancies in global bond markets.

  • In 1998, after the Asian Financial Crisis and Russia’s sovereign default, markets behaved in ways the models had never anticipated.

  • Spreads widened instead of converging, liquidity vanished, and LTCM’s enormous leveraged positions produced massive losses.

  • The fund’s near-collapse threatened global financial stability due to its interconnected positions.

  • The Federal Reserve organized a private-sector rescue by major banks, and LTCM was unwound — becoming a landmark case study in modern financial risk.

What Drove the Collapse

  • Excessive leverage: LTCM used leverage of 25-to-1 and, in some trades, over 100-to-1. Small market moves erased equity instantly when spreads blew out.

  • Crowded trades and correlated risk: Many institutions were using similar convergence strategies. In stress, everyone rushed to exit the same positions, amplifying volatility.

  • Dependence on historical models: Strategies assumed normal market relationships and underestimated tail risk; models assumed liquidity that disappeared during crisis.

  • Liquidity crunch: Russia’s default caused a global flight from risk. Liquidity evaporated in fixed-income markets, making LTCM’s positions impossible to unwind without heavy losses.

  • Systemic interconnectedness: LTCM had derivatives exposure with every major Wall Street bank. Forced liquidation threatened broader Treasury and credit markets.

Investor Lessons

  • Leverage turns small pricing errors into existential threats, especially in strategies reliant on stable relationships and liquid markets.

  • Historical models fail in regime shifts or tail events; assumptions matter more than equations.

  • Liquidity risk can destroy even the most sophisticated strategies — liquidity is abundant in booms and nonexistent in crises.

  • When many participants crowd into similar trades, diversification becomes an illusion and exits become bottlenecks.

  • The core insight: “low-risk” strategies can be the most dangerous when they rely on leverage, narrow spreads, and the assumption that markets will behave like the past.